The amount of compensatory sweating depends on the patient, the damage that the white rami communicans incurs, and the amount of cell body reorganization in the spinal cord after surgery.
Other potential complications include inadequate resection of the ganglia, gustatory sweating, pneumothorax, cardiac dysfunction, post-operative pain, and finally Horner’s syndrome secondary to resection of the stellate ganglion.
www.ubcmj.com/pdf/ubcmj_2_1_2010_24-29.pdf

After severing the cervical sympathetic trunk, the cells of the cervical sympathetic ganglion undergo transneuronic degeneration
After severing the sympathetic trunk, the cells of its origin undergo complete disintegration within a year.

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1439-0442.1967.tb00255.x/abstract

Saturday, April 23, 2011

It is possible that sympathectomy affects non-immunological processes involved in tumor progression, such as extravasation, development of blood supply

Lacrimal gland, tear film, and dry eye syndromes 2: 

basic science and clinical relevance
Front Cover

GUSTATORY SWEATING AND OTHER RESPONSES AFTER SYMPATHECTOMY


Gustatory sweating on the head, neck and arms, often occurs after cervico-thoracic sympathectomy. Haxton (1948) reported an incidence of 36 percent, the same as in the present series. It was thought that some information about regeneration in the cervical sympathetic might be revealed by investigation of this surgical curiosity.
Although sweating is the common gustatory response after cervical sympathectomy, other changes are experienced. Haxton (1948) described associated paresthesia and flushing, gooseflesh may occur (Herxheimer, 1958) and vaso-constriction is reported in this paper. These occur together or separately and occasionally sweating might be absent. The subject has been confused by comparison with post-parotidectomy gustatory sweating which has a different mechanism (Glaister et al.,1958; Bloor, 1958).

Sweating is produced by cholinergic sympathetic fibres. In normal individuals both vasocontriction and gooseflesh are adrenergic. This also holds in gustatory responses.  Figure 2 shows blocking of sweating by atropine, whilst gooseflesh continues unchanged.
   The tingling sensations were described as being unlike normal sensation, and likened to plucking out of hair. In one patient in was so unpleasant that she refused to take a test stimulus. Flushing usually occurs on the upper chest and neck, and is an erythema with sharp demarcation, not associated with a rise in skin temperature.
   Of the patients, 29 were found to have gustatory responses, and 24 were studied in detail. Of 22 patients with sweating who could be studied, 11 had gooseflesh, 10 tingling, 6 flushing, and 4 vasoconstriction. Four patients, however, had no sweating and their gustator responses consisted of gooseflesh and tingling in one, tingling alone, and flushing in two. None of these four showed vasoconstriction.
   The stimulus for testing used was usually Worcester sauce, but specificity of the response was sometimes great, and one patient reacted only to boiled sweets made by one particular firm.

http://brain.oxfordjournals.org/content/92/1/137.extract   &
http://ang.sagepub.com/content/17/3/143.extract

The development of gustatory sweating after cervical sympathectomy can only be explained if one is to admit that the primary event of gustatory sweating is a degeneration of the cervical sympathetic neurons. The initial event is the loss of postganglionic sympathetic neurons and the resulting denervation of the corresponding facial sweat glands. Regeneration of parasympathetic fibers, within the degenerating sympathetic neurilemmal sheets, is a secondary event although it accounts for the observed symptoms.

Salivary gland disorders

Front Cover
Springer, 2007 - Medical - 517 pages









In a series of 100 bilateral upper dorsal sympathectomies performed for palmar hyperhidrosis, gustatory sweating and other gustatory phenomena were reported by 68 of 93 patients (73%), followed up for an average of 11/2 years. These gustatory phenomena were quite different from physiologic gustatory sweating: a wide range of gustatory stimuli caused a variety of phenomena in varied locations. There was a negative correlation between the incidence of these phenomena and the occurrence of Horner's syndrome after sympathectomy. Analysis of our observations, and of clinical and experimental work of others, leads to the conclusion that gustatory phenomena after upper dorsal sympathectomy are the result of preganglionic sympathetic regeneration or collateral sprouting with aberrant synapses in the superior cervical ganglion.


http://archneur.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/34/10/619

Mechanism of adrenal cortex stimulation following cervical sympathectomy

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14022522

Effects of right cervical sympathectomy on the ascorbic acid content of adrenals of thyroidectomized female rats

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/5358480

Consequences of right cervical sympathectomy on thyroid and adrenals in castrated rats

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/5734998

cervical sympathectomy works systemically through hypothalamus endocrine system

Background: To investigate the general action of stellate ganglion block (SGB), we examined the effects of heat stimulation and cold stress on the behavior and stress hormone of the bilateral cervical sympathectomy rats as a long-term and repeated SGB model. Methods: Wistar's male rats were divided into three groups: control (C), sham operation (S) and sympathectomy (Sx) groups. After 2 weeks, two experiments were done. One was measurement of escape response time from the heat stimulus and the other was hormone measurement. Serum adreno-corticotropic hormone (ACTH), .ALPHA.-melanocyte stimulating hormone (.ALPHA.-MSH) and .BETA.-endorphine (.BETA.-END) levels were measured assigning 3 groups to 2 subgroups with and without cold stress. Results: Escape response time was significantly extended in the Sx group. ACTH in the Sx group was significantly higher than in other groups, but changes of ACTH by cold stress were similar in 3 groups. In the Sx group .ALPHA.-MSH was hardly changed by cold stress while .ALPHA.-MSH was significantly decreased in the S group. Changes of .BETA.-END by cold stress were similar in the S and Sx groups. Conclusions: These results suggest that SGB works systemically through hypothalamus endocrine system and affects stress hormone differently. (author abst.)

http://sciencelinks.jp/j-east/article/200402/000020040204A0020288.php

Unilateral cervical sympathectomy resulted in a moderate and short decrease in milk secretion

the average amount of milk given by operated animals 10 days after operation being 76-3% of the initial level. Total cervical sympathectomy (the 2nd operation was performed 1 month later) caused a much greater and more prolonged decrease in milk secretion, 59.7% of the initial level being secreted during the 10 days after operation. A gradual increase in milk secretion was observed after the operation and this increase was more gradual after total sympathectomy than after partial sympathectomy. Denervation of the thyroid and parathyroids did not decrease milk secretion. Section of the pituitary stalk in 6 goats, which included complete section (2 goats), complete section with scar tissue at the site of section and considerable damage to the median eminence of the tuber einereum (1 goat) and incomplete section (3 goats) was performed. Milk ejection disappeared completely for 7-11 days in the goats with complete section and remained defective for some weeks after, but was still effective in those where the infundibular stem and part of the glandular portion of the pituitary stalk was still intact. Milk secretion was 28.9% of the initial level in the goats with complete section and 12.9% in the goat with the scar tissue whereas it was 40.5 and 55.7% in the incompletely sectioned and control operated goats. (See also D.S.A. 21 [3081].) D.E.E.




Influence of cervical sympathectomy and pituitary stalk section upon milk secretion in goats.

Authors

TVERSKOY, G. B.




Journal




Nature 1960 Vol. 186 No. 4727 pp. 782-84

ISSN

0028-0836

DOI

10.1038/186782a0