Clinical Studies
The following comments are from clinical studies which demonstrated the safety and effectiveness of Drionic:
- Efficacy of the Drionic unit in the treatment of hyperhidrosis. J Am Acad Dermatol 1987;16:828-832. "...the Drionic unit appears to have a definite place in the treatment of hyperhidrosis." Daniel L. Akins, M.D. John L. Meisenheimer, M.D. Richard L. Dobson, M.D., Professor & Chairman, Dept. of Dermatology From the Department of Dermatology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
- A new device in the treatment of hyperhidrosis by iontophoresis. Cutis 1982;29:82-89. Drionic effectively "...reduced sweating for up to 6 weeks..." Further, the study concluded that "Because of its design, it has great potential for home use." CPT John L. Peterson, M.D. MAJ Sandra I. Read, M.D. COL Orlando G. Rodman, M.D. Chief, Dermatology Service From the Dermatology Service, Dept. of Medicine, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC
- Tap water iontophoresis in the treatment of hyperhidrosis. Int J Dermatol 26;1987:194-197. "Tap water iontophoresis is a recognized method of reducing sweat in various parts of the body. The Drionic device is a battery-operated method of inducing tap water iontophoresis. This simple device may be used at home and is effective in reducing hyperhidrosis for as long as 6 weeks." Mervyn L. Elgart, M.D., Professor & Chairman, Dept. of Dermatology Glenn Fuchs, M.D. From the Department of Dermatology, George Washington Univ. Medical Center, Washington, DC.
- Efficacy of the Drionic unit in the treatment of hyperhidrosis. JAm Acad Dermatol 16:828-832, Apr. 1987. Elgart ML, Fuchs G: Tap water iontophoresis in the treatment of hyperhidrosis. Int J Dermatol 26: 194-197, Apr. 1987. (old model)